How does the authors' use of language in paragraph 2 of the article "Cameras in

Question

the Courtroom" and paragraph 1 of the article "Challenging the Status Quo"
convey DIFFERENT tones?
The phrase "supported the ban" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" expresses a pleased
tone, while the phrase "stuck in old ways" in "Challenging the Status Quo"
contributes to a frustrated tone.
The phrase "defendants would get nervous" in "Cameras in the Courtoom"
expresses a concerned tone, while the phrase "a closed loop" in "Challenging the
Status Quo" indicates an explanatory tone.
The phrase "jurors would be distracted" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" contributes
to a scornful tone, while the phrase "Everyone should be" in "Challenging the Status
Quo" suggests an arrogant tone.
The phrase "All these factors" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" develops an analytical
tone, while the phrase "better way of functioning" in "Challengin the Status Quo"
builds a hopeful tone.

Answer 1

To analyze how the authors' use of language in the specified paragraphs conveys different tones, let's break down the examples you've provided.

1. "Supported the ban" vs. "Stuck in old ways":

   • The phrase "supported the ban" suggests a sense of acceptance or approval regarding the prohibition of cameras, which can be interpreted as pleased or satisfied.
   • Conversely, "stuck in old ways" carries a negative connotation, implying a lack of progress or a reluctance to change, thus contributing to a frustrated tone.

2. "Defendants would get nervous" vs. "A closed loop":

   • The phrase "defendants would get nervous" conveys a worried or concerned tone, indicating that the presence of cameras negatively affects the defendants' emotional state.
   • The term "a closed loop" is more neutral and descriptive, suggesting an explanatory tone focused on the cycle of limited dialogue or interaction, without the emotional weight of the former phrase.

3. "Jurors would be distracted" vs. "Everyone should be":

   • The phrase "jurors would be distracted" implies a judgment about jurors’ inability to focus, contributing to a scornful tone regarding their capacity to perform their duties effectively.
   • In contrast, "Everyone should be" carries an authoritative or presumptive tone, suggesting that there is a justified reason for needing to be aware of certain issues, which can come across as arrogant.

4. "All these factors" vs. "better way of functioning":

   • The phrase "All these factors" suggests a careful and methodical analysis, contributing to an analytical tone as it indicates a consideration of multiple elements at play.
   • On the other hand, "better way of functioning" suggests a vision for improvement and progress, conveying a hopeful tone about potential changes or advancements.

Conclusion:

• The first option effectively contrasts the pleased tone of the first paragraph with the frustrated tone of the second paragraph through their specific language choices.
• The second pair contrasts a concerned tone with a more neutral explanatory tone.
• The third contrasts a scornful tone with an arrogant tone through their implications about competence.
• The last comparison highlights the difference between analytical and hopeful tones.

Overall, these variations in language and phrasing help create distinct emotional atmospheres in each paragraph, reflecting the authors' intentions and attitudes toward their subjects.

Answer 2

CORRECT ANSWER

Answer 3

Based on your prompt, the correct answer that accurately conveys the different tones in the specific phrases from the paragraphs is:

The phrase "supported the ban" in "Cameras in the Courtroom" expresses a pleased tone, while the phrase "stuck in old ways" in "Challenging the Status Quo" contributes to a frustrated tone.

This option correctly identifies the pleased tone associated with support for the ban in the first article and the frustrated tone associated with the notion of being "stuck in old ways" in the second article.