How does Rutherford’s model of the atom compare with Thomson’s model?

They both describe atoms as small, indivisible spheres.
They both describe electrons as moving around the nucleus.
They both describe electrons as being surrounded by the positive matter.
They both describe atoms as being made up of positive and negative matter.

1 answer

Rutherford's model of the atom and Thomson's model represent two distinct stages in atomic theory, with notable differences:

  1. Thomson's Model (Plum Pudding Model):

    • Proposed around 1897, following Thomson's discovery of the electron.
    • Describes the atom as a homogeneous sphere of positive charge (the "pudding"), with negatively charged electrons (the "plums") embedded throughout.
    • The atom is thought to be a uniform mix of positive and negative charges, where electrons are distributed within the positive matrix.
  2. Rutherford's Model:

    • Introduced in 1911 after Rutherford's gold foil experiment, which provided evidence for a dense nucleus.
    • Suggests that the atom is mostly empty space, with electrons orbiting a small, dense, positively charged nucleus at its center.
    • This was a departure from Thomson’s idea of a uniform structure and instead proposed a nucleus containing most of the atom’s mass and positive charge, with electrons located outside this nucleus.

Based on these contrasts:

  • They both describe atoms as small, indivisible spheres: False. While Thomson's model pictures an indivisible sphere, Rutherford's model introduces the idea of a central nucleus, so it's not just a sphere anymore.

  • They both describe electrons as moving around the nucleus: False. Only Rutherford's model describes electrons orbiting around a nucleus; Thomson's model does not incorporate a nucleus.

  • They both describe electrons as being surrounded by the positive matter: True for Thomson's model but False for Rutherford's model. In Thomson’s model, electrons are embedded in a positive medium, but in Rutherford's model, the electrons are in orbits around a concentrated positive nucleus.

  • They both describe atoms as being made up of positive and negative matter: True for both models. Thomson’s model has a blended mixture of positive and negative charges. Rutherford’s model acknowledges the positive charge of the nucleus and the negative charge of the electrons orbiting it.

In summary, Rutherford's model significantly revised the concept of the atom by establishing the nuclear model, contrasting with Thomson's more simplistic representation of charged matter.