How does paragraph 4 contribute to the debate over whether graffiti should be protected?

Question

which one is right
• It shows that National Parks cannot preserve contemporary graffiti while also preserving the past.

• It explains that National Parks do not have enough space for everyone to leave their mark.

• It suggests that protecting graffiti could negatively influence activity in other parks.

It describes the detailed process required to protect each piece of graffiti.

Answer 1

The correct answer is: It suggests that protecting graffiti could negatively influence activity in other parks.

Paragraph 4 likely discusses the time-consuming and labor-intensive process of protecting graffiti in National Parks. This could lead to the argument that allocating resources to protect graffiti could take away from other important activities and maintenance in the parks. It could prompt the question of whether protecting graffiti is worth potentially sacrificing other aspects of park management.