Judicial activism generally refers to the approach where courts take an active role in interpreting the Constitution and laws, often by addressing social and political issues. Given this understanding, the most accurate response to how judicial activism affects the court's decisions is:
The court will rule on the actions of the other branches or judicial precedent.
This indicates that the court is willing to engage with and potentially overturn the decisions of other branches of government or establish new legal precedents based on its interpretations.