The differences between online discussion groups and face-to-face groups can involve various factors. Here’s a breakdown of the statements you provided:
-
There is no need for group roles when holding online meetings. - This statement is generally not true. Group roles can still be important in online settings, just as they are in face-to-face meetings. Roles such as facilitator, timekeeper, or note-taker can enhance the structure and effectiveness of online discussions.
-
Online discussion groups do not allow members to develop critical-thinking skills. - This statement is also misleading. Members can and often do develop critical-thinking skills in both online and face-to-face discussion groups. The mode of communication does not necessarily inhibit critical thinking; it may even enhance it by encouraging written responses and more thoughtful contributions.
-
Group members are more likely to bond together as a group online than they would when meeting face-to-face. - This is typically false. While online groups can certainly form bonds, face-to-face interactions often facilitate stronger personal connections due to the immediate, non-verbal cues and social dynamics present in physical meetings.
-
Facilitating an online conversation may require even more work, so that participants continue engaging with one another online. - This statement is true. Facilitating online discussions can be more challenging as it often requires additional strategies to ensure engagement, such as prompts, monitoring participation, and managing different forms of communication (text, audio, video).
In summary, the fourth statement accurately reflects a key difference, highlighting the additional effort required to maintain engagement in an online discussion group compared to a face-to-face setting.
1 answer