The primary differences between online discussion groups and face-to-face discussion groups can be summarized as follows:
-
Group Roles: The first statement, "There is no need for group roles when holding online meetings," is misleading. While the dynamics of group roles may change in an online setting, they still exist and may manifest differently. It might require adaptation of roles to fit the online format, but they aren't eliminated.
-
Critical-Thinking Skills: The second statement, "Online discussion groups do not allow members to develop critical-thinking skills," is inaccurate. Both online and face-to-face discussions can foster critical-thinking skills. The medium of communication does not inherently determine the critical engagement of participants.
-
Group Bonding: The third statement, "Group members are more likely to bond together as a group online than they would when meeting face-to-face," is also not generally true. While online interactions can foster connections, in-person meetings often allow for stronger personal connections and non-verbal communication, which can enhance bonding.
-
Facilitating Engagement: The fourth statement, "Facilitating an online conversation may require even more work, so that participants continue engaging with one another online," is quite accurate. Online facilitation often requires additional strategies to keep participants engaged, such as using prompts, managing distractions, and ensuring inclusivity, as the lack of physical presence can sometimes lead to disengagement.
In summary, while both online and face-to-face discussion groups have their advantages and challenges, effective facilitation and engagement are crucial in both formats.
1 answer