How does a hypothesis differ from a scientific theory?(1 point)

Question

Responses a b c or d and why

Theories always lead to the development of new scientific ideas/laws and are not proven scientifically, while hypotheses are.
Theories always lead to the development of new scientific ideas/laws and are not proven scientifically, while hypotheses are.

Theories are educated guesses based on certain data, while hypotheses explain natural phenomenon and are validated by experimentation.
Theories are educated guesses based on certain data, while hypotheses explain natural phenomenon and are validated by experimentation.

Theories are well established with lots of evidence data to support their claims, while hypotheses are based on limited data.
Theories are well established with lots of evidence data to support their claims, while hypotheses are based on limited data.

Hypotheses are testable and rely on evidence for verification, while theories only exist conditionally and rely on possibility.

Answer 1

The best response is c: "Theories are well established with lots of evidence data to support their claims, while hypotheses are based on limited data."

Explanation:

• A hypothesis is a tentative statement or prediction that can be tested through experimentation and observation. It is often based on limited data or preliminary observations and should be testable and falsifiable.

• A theory, on the other hand, is a well-substantiated explanation that has been repeatedly tested and confirmed through a significant body of evidence. Theories integrate and explain multiple hypotheses and observations and are widely accepted within the scientific community as the best explanations for particular phenomena.

Therefore, the key difference lies in their levels of evidence and acceptance in the scientific community.