How do you work square root problems when there is a number outside the radical that needs to be divided out.

Example: 2(square root of 5x-1)=3(square root of 2x+4). How can you get both of the radicals by themselves in order to solve the equation?

16 answers

4 (5x-1) = 9 (2x+4) you mean?
By the way be careful to check results whenever you square both sides like that. remember -1^2 = +1^2
so you can introduce answers that do not work in the original.
The two and the three are both being multiplied to the square roots that are on both sides of the equal sign. I don't know how to isolate the radicals(to get everything being added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided away) in order to square everything to get rid of the radicals. If the problem was 4+(square root of 4+3x)=6, I know that all you do is subtract the four at the beginning and you square everything. It would be 4+3x=4 and then solve from there, which this problem probably doesn't work b/c I made it up.
look
5 sqrt (25) = sqrt (625)
5^2 (25) = 625
25 * 25 = 625
625 = 625
How are you getting the five? I am not really understanding. Since the numbers 2 and 3 are being MULTIPLIED, how can you just add them instead of dividing
this is all because
[5 sqrt(25) ][5 sqrt(25)] = 25 * 25
WHERE ARE YOU GETTING THE 5 AND THE 25. HOW ARE YOU MULTIPLYING THESE RANDOM NUMBERS TOGETHER?
I just made the problem with 5 up to show what is happening
the point is that in your problem
[ 2 sqrt(5x-1) ] [ 2 sqrt (5x-1) ]
= 2*2 * (5x-1)
= 4 * (5x-1)
Perhaps say
(a * b)^2 = a^2 * b^2
whatever a and b are
my teacher told me that the only way you can square EVERYTHING was if you ISOLATE the radicals. What you're doing is something completely different.

You could have told me you made up a completely different problem.
Ok, isolate the radicals

2 sqrt (5x-1) is
sqrt [(4)(5x-1) ]
= sqrt ( 20 x -4)

and on the other side
3 sqrt (2x+4) is
sqrt[(9)(2x+4)]
= sqrt (18 x + 36)

then square both sides. It is harder but comes out the same :)
So you distribute the 3 and the 2 to the numbers inside the radical?
Yes, you can do that but not necessary
hen your teacher said "isolate the radicals, I think the teacher meant "isolate the term with the radical"
like something + sqrt someting is bad
but something times sqrt something is ok

By the way, since further down you said you know how to foil, you know how to square (a + sqrt b)
(a+sqrt b)(a+sqrt b) = a^2 + 2 a sqrt b + b
however your teacher said do not do that because it did not help, you still have a square root in there.
Thanks for your help, you spent a lot of time with my problem. It is GREATLY APPRECIATED and it helps with the confusion I had on the quiz today. My teacher was not there to answer my question and she had never taught us how to solve these type of problems. Thanks again.
You are very welcome - good luck!
Similar Questions
  1. Ok so I'm suppose to do thisSquare root of 6 ___________________ Square root of 2 I know when you divide a radical over radical
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. True or False and please explain so that I can understand.1. The rationalized form of 125 over the square root of 14 involves no
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Express in simplest radical form.square root of, 3, x, end square root 3x ​ Answer Multiple Choice Answers square root of, 3,
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  4. Help Fast PLEASE!!check for corrections on my problems 1.Rewrte the following in simplified radical form, Assume all variables
    1. answers icon 4 answers
more similar questions