The rights of the local population typically differ under direct and indirect rule primarily in terms of governance and political representation.
-
Direct Rule: Under direct rule, a colonial power exerts direct control over the territory and its administration. Local populations usually have little to no say in government, as officials from the colonial power make decisions without local input. This often leads to a lack of representation for the local population in political matters.
-
Indirect Rule: In contrast, indirect rule allows for a degree of local governance where traditional leaders or local rulers are retained in their positions and given some authority to administer local affairs. This system may provide the local population with a voice in governance, as these leaders can channel the concerns and needs of their communities to the colonial authorities.
In summary, the primary difference lies in the degree of political representation and participation that local populations have in governance under the two systems. In direct rule, the local populations generally have limited political rights, whereas in indirect rule, they may have some say through local leaders.
Therefore, the most accurate distinction based on the options provided would be: They differ in whether local people have a say in government.