How did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures?(1 point)

Responses

Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.

Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.

Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.

Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney.

1 answer

The correct response is:

Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.

The ruling in Miranda v. Arizona established that individuals in custody must be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning to prevent self-incrimination.