How did the ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case change law enforcement procedures?(1 point)
Responses
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement may question a suspect before reading a suspect their rights.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney.
Law enforcement may interrogate a suspect without the presence of an attorney.
Law enforcement may search a home without a warrant.
5 answers
Law enforcement must read a suspect their Miranda rights prior to being interrogated.
Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case?(1 point)
Responses
The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.
The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution.
Responses
The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.
The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution.
The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Which statement best assesses the impact of the cases Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland on the Constitution?(1 point)
Responses
Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
Both cases did not increase any federal power.
Responses
Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
Both cases increased the powers of the federal government.
Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the executive branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
Both cases did not increase any federal power.
Both cases increased the powers of the judicial branch.
1 answer