How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling? (1 point) Responses It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land. It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land. It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees. It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees. It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state. It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state. It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States. It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States. Question 9 #9

1 answer

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 went against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling because it ignored the fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States. The Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v. Georgia recognized the sovereignty of Native American nations and their right to govern themselves, which was contradicted by the Indian Removal Act that facilitated the forcible displacement of Native Americans from their ancestral lands.