How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling?(1 point)

Question

Responses

It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state.
It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state.

It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.
It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.

It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land.
It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land.

It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.

Answer 1

The correct response is:

It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.

The Worcester v. Georgia ruling stated that the state of Georgia had no authority to impose its laws on Cherokee territory, recognizing the sovereignty of Native American nations. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 conflicted with this ruling by facilitating the forced removal of Native Americans from their lands, disregarding their sovereignty.