How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling?(1 point) Responses It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state. It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state. It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States. It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States. It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land. It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land. It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees. It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.

Answer 1

The correct response is: It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.

The Worcester v. Georgia ruling established that Native American nations were sovereign entities and that states did not have the authority to regulate them. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 contradicted this ruling by facilitating the forced relocation of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, disregarding their sovereignty and legal land rights as recognized by the Supreme Court.