How did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 go against the Worcester v. Georgia ruling?(1 point)

Question

Responses

It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.
It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.

It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.
It nullified all previous treaties that protected the interests of Georgians against Cherokees.

It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state.
It was a law banning Native American groups from owning land within the borders of any U.S. state.

It extended a military campaign against Native American peoples who had farm land.

Answer 1

The correct response is:

It ignored that fact that Native American lands were sovereign and not technically part of the United States.

The Worcester v. Georgia ruling established that Native American nations were distinct, sovereign entities, and that state laws could not be enforced in their territories. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 disregarded this ruling by facilitating the removal of Native American tribes from their ancestral lands, asserting federal authority over these sovereign nations.