How did the fighting of World War II differ from the fighting of World War I? (1 point) Responses Less soldiers used Less soldiers used Increased use of airplanes Increased use of airplanes More trench warfare More trench warfare Less battles

Answer 1

Increased use of airplanes and less battles are the key differences between the fighting of World War II and World War I. In World War II, there was a significant increase in the use of airplanes for both reconnaissance and combat purposes. This led to more aerial battles and the development of strategies that involved air superiority.

Additionally, World War II saw less trench warfare compared to World War I. Trench warfare was a major feature of World War I, with soldiers digging trenches for protection and engaging in long and bloody battles. In World War II, new military technologies and strategies reduced the dependence on trench warfare, and the fighting became more mobile and dynamic.

It is important to note that the number of soldiers used can vary depending on the specific theater of war or country involved, so it may not be a defining difference between the two wars as a whole.

Answer 2

short answer

Answer 3

World War II differed from World War I in terms of increased use of airplanes and less reliance on trench warfare.