The most accurate differentiation between the views of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists regarding the Constitution is:
Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary, while Anti-Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights was needed to protect citizens.
Federalists argued that the Constitution itself was sufficient to protect individual liberties, while Anti-Federalists contended that explicit protections of rights were necessary to prevent governmental overreach and ensure individual freedoms.
The other statements are either incorrect or misrepresent the positions held by each group:
- Federalists did not want the Constitution to be as weak as the Articles of Confederation; they sought a stronger national government.
- Federalists generally supported a stronger national government, while Anti-Federalists favored stronger state governments.
- Neither group believed that the Constitution would set up another monarchy; instead, Federalists believed in the checks and balances designed in the Constitution to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.