The case Mapp v. Ohio established search warrants to prevent illegal searches and seizures. This landmark decision extended the protections of the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, to individuals accused of crimes in state courts, ensuring that evidence obtained unlawfully cannot be used in court.
How did the case in Mapp v. Ohio extend protections to people accused of crimes?(1 point)
Responses
The case established search warrants to only female criminals.
The case established search warrants to only female criminals.
The case established a maximum of two years in jail for criminals.
The case established a maximum of two years in jail for criminals.
The case established less probation time for criminals under the age of 35 years old.
The case established less probation time for criminals under the age of 35 years old.
The case established search warrants to prevent illegal searches and seizures.
3 answers
a b c or d
The correct response is: d. The case established search warrants to prevent illegal searches and seizures.
11 answers