How did Americans disagree over the role of federal and state governments before and during the Civil war?

Answer 1

Before the Civil War, Americans disagreed over the role of federal and state governments in a variety of ways. The main issue of contention was the power of the federal government to regulate slavery in the states. The Southern states argued that the federal government had no authority to interfere with slavery, while the Northern states argued that the federal government had the right to regulate slavery in the states. This disagreement eventually led to the Civil War. During the Civil War, the disagreement over the role of federal and state governments continued, with the North arguing for a stronger federal government and the South arguing for states' rights. The North wanted the federal government to have the power to enforce laws and regulations, while the South wanted the states to have the power to make their own laws and regulations. This disagreement ultimately led to the end of the Civil War and the adoption of the Thirteenth Amendment, which abolished slavery in the United States.

Answer 2

This is way too long i aint reading it 💀

Answer 3

XDDDD

Answer 4

okay so basically what that person said was that the north and south states fought over the power that the government had. the north believed that the government didn't have the authority to get interfere with slavery while the south disagreed. this lead to the civil war, through the whole civil war, the disagreement was still there and as strong as ever. in the end, the thirteenth Amendment was adopted, and abolished slavery in the United States.

this is very plain so if you are going to copy it then add more details from what you know/the text above. you're welcome

Answer 5

How did Americans disagree over the role of federal and state governments before and during the Civil War?

Answer 6

did Americans disagree over the role of federal and state governments before and during the Civil War?

Answer 7

Yes, Americans disagreed over the role of federal and state governments before and during the Civil War. The central point of contention was the extent to which the federal government had the authority to regulate slavery in the states. Southern states maintained that the federal government had no right to interfere with the institution of slavery, while Northern states argued that the federal government had the right to regulate slavery. This disagreement led to a series of political arguments and compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850, which aimed to maintain a fragile balance between the interests of the free and slave states. However, these compromises ultimately failed, and the conflict between federal and state governments contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War. During the war, Northern states generally argued for a stronger federal government capable of enforcing laws and regulations, while Southern states maintained that states should retain their autonomy and powers. The issue of states' rights continued to be a point of contention long after the end of the Civil War.

Answer 8

the central point is if contention was the extent to which the federal goverment had the authority to regulate slavery in the states