The most accurate and comprehensive response is:
We can use primary and secondary sources to analyze the resistance of enslaved peoples in order to gain firsthand knowledge of their motivations at the time, as well as use modern forms of historical examination as a lens to analyze their resistance.
This response acknowledges the importance of both primary and secondary sources in understanding the perspectives of enslaved peoples while also considering the role of contemporary analysis in providing context and interpretation. Primary sources offer direct insights into the experiences and motivations of the enslaved, while secondary sources can synthesize this information and provide modern interpretations that enhance our understanding of their resistance.