How are the responses of Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois to discrimination and goals for improvement similar/different? Which leader’s approach was more effective?

W.E.B Du Bois Approach was more effective as he campaigned immediate civil rights and higher education for the African Americans.

1 answer

Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois had differing approaches to addressing the issues of discrimination and the advancement of African Americans in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Similarities:

  1. Desire for Progress: Both leaders sought improvement in the social and economic conditions for African Americans, believing that progress was achievable.
  2. Focus on Education: They both emphasized the importance of education. Washington advocated for vocational training and practical skills, while Du Bois stressed the importance of higher education and liberal arts.
  3. Concern over Racism: Both were deeply concerned about the systemic racism and discrimination faced by African Americans, highlighting the need for change.

Differences:

  1. Philosophy of Approach:

    • Booker T. Washington: He promoted a philosophy of accommodation and gradualism, suggesting that African Americans should focus on vocational skills and economic self-reliance. He believed that through hard work, African Americans could earn the respect of white society, eventually leading to social and political rights.
    • W.E.B. Du Bois: In contrast, Du Bois criticized Washington's approach for being too accommodating. He advocated for immediate civil rights and political representation, emphasizing the need for a "Talented Tenth" – a leadership class of educated and trained African Americans who would fight for civil rights and challenge social inequalities directly.
  2. Goals:

    • Washington: Aimed at economic advancement as the pathway to uplift, focusing on the lives of the majority of poor black farmers and laborers.
    • Du Bois: Aimed for full civil rights and political representation as fundamental rights that should not be delayed, arguing for a more immediate and confrontational stance against racial discrimination.

Effectiveness of Their Approaches:

The effectiveness of each approach can be evaluated from different perspectives:

  • Washington's Approach: Washington's focus on vocational education and practical skills did help many African Americans gain employment and economic stability in the early years following slavery. His ideas were popular among some white philanthropists and politicians, as they seemed to suggest that African Americans were willing to work hard without demanding immediate rights. However, critics argue that this strategy left many systemic issues unaddressed and allowed for ongoing discrimination and segregation.

  • Du Bois' Approach: Du Bois’ push for civil rights and higher education directly contributed to the formation of organizations like the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). This activism fostered future generations of civil rights leaders and laid the groundwork for the more direct confrontations against segregation and discrimination that would characterize the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s.

In summary, while Washington's approach had immediate practical outcomes for some individuals, Du Bois' approach can be viewed as more effective in the long term, as it laid the foundation for the struggle for civil rights and social equality that would follow. The enduring impact of Du Bois' ideas is evident in the civil rights advancements achieved in the later decades of the 20th century.