hii

How did the increasing power of military leaders help bring about the end of the republic?

(1 point)
Responses

The military leaders freed the slaves that worked in the mines.

The military leaders freed the slaves that worked in the mines.

The military leaders refused to help the poor in the cities.

The military leaders refused to help the poor in the cities.

The military leaders began to get more loyalty from soldiers than the government did.

The military leaders began to get more loyalty from soldiers than the government did.

The military leaders forbade the poor from serving in the military.

11 answers

The correct response is:

The military leaders began to get more loyalty from soldiers than the government did.

This shift in loyalty contributed to the decline of the Roman Republic as military leaders gained power and influence over their troops, often challenging the authority of the Senate and the established government.

Which was a result of Rome having a less rugged landscape than Greece?

(1 point)
Responses

Roman city-states grew in isolation from one another.

Roman city-states grew in isolation from one another.

Rome was able to easily unify the whole Italian peninsula.

Rome was able to easily unify the whole Italian peninsula.

Roman soldiers could not move around easily.

Roman soldiers could not move around easily.

Rome had to import grain from neighboring places.

Rome had to import grain from neighboring places.

The correct response is:

Rome was able to easily unify the whole Italian peninsula.

Unlike Greece, which had a rugged landscape that led to the development of isolated city-states, Rome's more conducive topography allowed for greater unification and integration of the territories within the Italian peninsula.

"I am quite certain that . . . (Rome) would never have been able to be so great had not the immortal gods been placated."

ā€“Cicero, from The Nature of the Gods

According to Cicero, what was the reason why Rome was so great?

(1 point)
Responses

The government adopted Judaism.

The government adopted Judaism.

They believed in only one god.

They believed in only one god.

The government was a republic.

The government was a republic.

They had made the gods happy

The correct response is:

They had made the gods happy.

According to Cicero, the greatness of Rome was attributed to the appeasement of the gods, reflecting the importance of religion and divine favor in Roman society.

How did the Greek culture influence the development of the Roman republic? How did the Etruscan culture influence the development of the Roman republic? 5th grader words please

Certainly! Here's a simple explanation:

Greek Influence on the Roman Republic: The Romans looked up to the Greeks and learned a lot from their culture. They admired Greek art, literature, and philosophy. Romans started to write plays and stories using Greek ideas, and they built beautiful buildings inspired by Greek styles. They also adopted Greek gods but gave them new names. Overall, Greek culture helped Romans become more creative and smarter.

Etruscan Influence on the Roman Republic: The Etruscans were a group of people who lived in Italy before the Romans. They had a big impact on early Roman culture. The Romans learned about building things like roads and cities from the Etruscans. They also got ideas about how to organize their army and how to dress. The Etruscans helped Romans learn how to have a good government and use symbols for power, like the toga.

In summary, both the Greeks and Etruscans helped shape the way the Romans lived, thought, and governed themselves!

What are three similarities between the Roman republic government and the United States government? What are three differences between the Roman republic government and the United States government? also 5th grader words please

Sure! Here are three similarities and three differences between the Roman Republic government and the United States government, using simple words:

Similarities:

  1. Elected Leaders: In both the Roman Republic and the United States, people can vote to choose their leaders. In Rome, they elected officials called consuls. In the U.S., people vote for the president and members of Congress.

  2. Checks and Balances: Both governments have systems to make sure no one gets too powerful. In Rome, different groups like the Senate and the assemblies had power to check each other. In the U.S., thereā€™s the executive branch (the president), the legislative branch (Congress), and the judicial branch (courts) that work together and keep each other in check.

  3. Laws and Citizenship: Both the Roman Republic and the United States have laws that citizens must follow. They also have rules about who can be a citizen and what rights citizens have.

Differences:

  1. Time Period: The Roman Republic existed a long time ago (around 509 BC to 27 BC), while the United States government started much more recently (in 1789). They are from different times in history.

  2. Size of Government: The Roman Republic had fewer officials and was smaller compared to the United States government today, which has many more people in different roles. The U.S. has many levels of government, including local, state, and federal, making it a lot bigger.

  3. Rights of Citizens: In the Roman Republic, only free men could be citizens and have rights, while in the United States, all citizens, regardless of gender or background (as long as they meet certain rules), have rights today.

So, while the Roman Republic and the United States share some important ideas, they are also quite different in how they work!

Read the quote about women in Roman society.

ā€œ[T]he position of the Roman matron was quite different from that of the Greek matron in the time of Pericles. The Roman matron was mistress in her own household. As the husband took charge of all external transactions, so the wife was supreme in household arrangements.ā€

ā€”James Donaldson, Woman; Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome

Based on your knowledge of the role of women in the Roman republic, provide evidence to prove the authorā€™s claim that the position of Roman women was different from that of Greek women. 5th grader words please. Thanks!! :)

Sure! Here are some points that show how the position of women in the Roman Republic was different from that of women in ancient Greece:

  1. Household Control: In Rome, women were in charge of the home. They managed things like cooking, taking care of children, and organizing the household. This meant they had a lot of power and respect in their families. In Greece, especially during the time of Pericles, women were usually expected to stay at home and were not given as much responsibility or freedom.

  2. Social Activities: Roman women could attend parties, go to public events, and sometimes even own property. They had more chances to be involved in social life. In contrast, Greek women often had to stay indoors and were not allowed to join in the same social events as men.

  3. Education: Roman women had better access to education compared to Greek women. Some Roman women could read and write. In Greece, many women didnā€™t get the same opportunities for education and were often kept from learning how to read or write.

  4. Legal Rights: Roman women had some legal rights, like being able to own property and control their dowries (money or gifts brought into a marriage). Greek women had almost no legal rights and were usually treated as dependents of their fathers or husbands.

These points show that Roman women had a more important and respected role in their homes and society compared to Greek women, who were more restricted and had fewer responsibilities.