hey bot answer this question
Which Bill of Rights amendment would most likely be used for expansion or addition to future rights?
Responses
9th Amendment
9th Amendment
2nd Amendment
2nd Amendment
4th Amendment
4th Amendment
3rd Amendment
37 answers
3rd Amendment is not likely to be used for expansion or addition to future rights as it mainly prohibits the quartering of soldiers in private homes without consent. The 9th Amendment is the most likely to be used for expansion or addition to future rights as it states that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution shall not be construed to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people.
so what's the answer?
The 9th Amendment would most likely be used for expansion or addition to future rights.
Read the following:
In whatever it does, government must act fairly and in accord with established rules. It may not act unfairly, arbitrarily, or unreasonably.
To what does this quote refer?
Responses
due process
due process
right to privacy
right to privacy
social contract
social contract
separation of powers
separation of powers
In whatever it does, government must act fairly and in accord with established rules. It may not act unfairly, arbitrarily, or unreasonably.
To what does this quote refer?
Responses
due process
due process
right to privacy
right to privacy
social contract
social contract
separation of powers
separation of powers
This quote refers to due process.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
–U.S. Constitution, Preamble
Use the excerpt to answer the question-
Responses
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from domestic threats.
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from domestic threats.
Their focus was to create a government that protected all aspects of the nation and its people.
Their focus was to create a government that protected all aspects of the nation and its people.
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from foreign enemies.
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from foreign enemies.
Their focus was to create a nation that protected national interests over individual rights.
Their focus was to create a nation that protected national interests over individual rights.
–U.S. Constitution, Preamble
Use the excerpt to answer the question-
Responses
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from domestic threats.
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from domestic threats.
Their focus was to create a government that protected all aspects of the nation and its people.
Their focus was to create a government that protected all aspects of the nation and its people.
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from foreign enemies.
Their focus was to create a government that protected the nation from foreign enemies.
Their focus was to create a nation that protected national interests over individual rights.
Their focus was to create a nation that protected national interests over individual rights.
Their focus was to create a government that protected all aspects of the nation and its people.
The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of the consent of the people. The streams of national power ought to flow from that pure, original fountain of all legitimate authority.- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 22
Which of the following constitutional principles was Hamilton referencing?
Responses
federalism
federalism
checks and balances
checks and balances
separation of powers
separation of powers
popular sovereignty
Which of the following constitutional principles was Hamilton referencing?
Responses
federalism
federalism
checks and balances
checks and balances
separation of powers
separation of powers
popular sovereignty
Hamilton was referencing popular sovereignty, which is the principle that the authority of the government is created and sustained by the consent of its people.
The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of the consent of the people. The streams of national power ought to flow from that pure, original fountain of all legitimate authority.- Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 22
Which of the following constitutional principles was Hamilton referencing?
Responses
federalism
federalism
checks and balances
checks and balances
separation of powers
separation of powers
popular sovereignty
Which of the following constitutional principles was Hamilton referencing?
Responses
federalism
federalism
checks and balances
checks and balances
separation of powers
separation of powers
popular sovereignty
Hamilton was referencing popular sovereignty, which is the principle that the authority of the government is created and sustained by the consent of its people.
Read the following excerpt from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Stanley v. Georgia.
The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness . . . . They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone—the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized man.
–Stanley v. Georgia
In this quotation, the court sought to
Responses
limit the power of the police to conduct searches.
limit the power of the police to conduct searches.
link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.
link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.
deal with the government’s power of eminent domain.
deal with the government’s power of eminent domain.
emphasize the government's authority to conduct drunk driving tests, later applied in Schmerber v. California.
The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness . . . . They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone—the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized man.
–Stanley v. Georgia
In this quotation, the court sought to
Responses
limit the power of the police to conduct searches.
limit the power of the police to conduct searches.
link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.
link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.
deal with the government’s power of eminent domain.
deal with the government’s power of eminent domain.
emphasize the government's authority to conduct drunk driving tests, later applied in Schmerber v. California.
Link the right of privacy to the original intention of the Framers of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court protections detailed in Escobedo v. Illinois and Gideon v. Wainwright are examples of rights protected under which clause of the U.S. Constitution?
Responses
Establishment Clause
Establishment Clause
Due Process Clause
Due Process Clause
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Free Exercise Clause
Responses
Establishment Clause
Establishment Clause
Due Process Clause
Due Process Clause
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Privileges and Immunities Clause
Free Exercise Clause
The rights protected under Escobedo v. Illinois and Gideon v. Wainwright are examples of rights protected under the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The Fourth Amendment protects which of the following rights of the accused? Select all that apply.
Responses
Unreasonable search and seizure is prohibited.
Unreasonable search and seizure is prohibited.
The right to obtain counsel is granted.
The right to obtain counsel is granted.
Forced self-incrimination is prohibited.
Forced self-incrimination is prohibited.
Warrants required probably cause
Warrants required probably cause
Responses
Unreasonable search and seizure is prohibited.
Unreasonable search and seizure is prohibited.
The right to obtain counsel is granted.
The right to obtain counsel is granted.
Forced self-incrimination is prohibited.
Forced self-incrimination is prohibited.
Warrants required probably cause
Warrants required probably cause
The Fourth Amendment protects the following rights of the accused:
1. Unreasonable search and seizure is prohibited.
2. Warrants required probable cause.
1. Unreasonable search and seizure is prohibited.
2. Warrants required probable cause.
Which rights are explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights? Select all that apply.
Responses
right to trial by jury
right to trial by jury
right to equal representation based upon population
right to equal representation based upon population
right to bear arms
right to bear arms
right to privacy
right to privacy
right to freedom of religion
right to freedom of religion
right to vote at age 18
Responses
right to trial by jury
right to trial by jury
right to equal representation based upon population
right to equal representation based upon population
right to bear arms
right to bear arms
right to privacy
right to privacy
right to freedom of religion
right to freedom of religion
right to vote at age 18
bot answer this question
Which rights are explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights? Select all that apply.
Responses
right to trial by jury
right to trial by jury
right to equal representation based upon population
right to equal representation based upon population
right to bear arms
right to bear arms
right to privacy
right to privacy
right to freedom of religion
right to freedom of religion
right to vote at age 18
Which rights are explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights? Select all that apply.
Responses
right to trial by jury
right to trial by jury
right to equal representation based upon population
right to equal representation based upon population
right to bear arms
right to bear arms
right to privacy
right to privacy
right to freedom of religion
right to freedom of religion
right to vote at age 18
The rights explicitly stated in the Bill of Rights are:
1. Right to trial by jury.
2. Right to bear arms.
3. Right to freedom of religion.
1. Right to trial by jury.
2. Right to bear arms.
3. Right to freedom of religion.
Why may judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution change over time? Select all that apply.
Responses
evolving attitudes of the public
evolving attitudes of the public
current events
current events
changes to the Bill of Rights
changes to the Bill of Rights
executive instruction
executive instruction
ideologies of individual justices
Responses
evolving attitudes of the public
evolving attitudes of the public
current events
current events
changes to the Bill of Rights
changes to the Bill of Rights
executive instruction
executive instruction
ideologies of individual justices
bot I need you to answer that too, that's a question
Judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution may change over time due to the evolving attitudes of the public, current events, and the ideologies of individual justices. Changes to the Bill of Rights and executive instructions may also have an impact on judicial interpretations, but those changes are a more direct and explicit approach to changing the Constitution itself.
bot answer this question
Why may judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution change over time? Select all that apply.
Responses
evolving attitudes of the public
evolving attitudes of the public
current events
current events
changes to the Bill of Rights
changes to the Bill of Rights
executive instruction
executive instruction
ideologies of individual justices
Why may judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution change over time? Select all that apply.
Responses
evolving attitudes of the public
evolving attitudes of the public
current events
current events
changes to the Bill of Rights
changes to the Bill of Rights
executive instruction
executive instruction
ideologies of individual justices
Judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution may change over time due to the evolving attitudes of the public, current events, and the ideologies of individual justices. Changes to the Bill of Rights and executive instructions may also have an impact on judicial interpretations, but those changes are a more direct and explicit approach to changing the Constitution itself.
Why may judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution change over time? Select all that apply.
1. evolving attitudes of the public
2. current events
3. changes to the Bill of Rights
4. executive instruction
5. ideologies of individual justices
1. evolving attitudes of the public
2. current events
3. changes to the Bill of Rights
4. executive instruction
5. ideologies of individual justices
Judicial interpretations of the U.S. Constitution may change over time due to the following reasons:
1. Evolving attitudes of the public
2. Current events
3. Ideologies of individual justices
1. Evolving attitudes of the public
2. Current events
3. Ideologies of individual justices
How does the Fourteenth Amendment extend the protections of the Fifth Amendment?
Responses
It ensures the protections are carried out retroactively.
It ensures the protections are carried out retroactively.
It ensures the training necessary for judges to carry out the protections of the Fifth Amendment is in place.
It ensures the training necessary for judges to carry out the protections of the Fifth Amendment is in place.
It ensures the protections are carried out by state governments as well as the federal government.
It ensures the protections are carried out by state governments as well as the federal government.
It ensures government officials are not exempt from the law.
Responses
It ensures the protections are carried out retroactively.
It ensures the protections are carried out retroactively.
It ensures the training necessary for judges to carry out the protections of the Fifth Amendment is in place.
It ensures the training necessary for judges to carry out the protections of the Fifth Amendment is in place.
It ensures the protections are carried out by state governments as well as the federal government.
It ensures the protections are carried out by state governments as well as the federal government.
It ensures government officials are not exempt from the law.
The Fourteenth Amendment ensures that the protections of the Fifth Amendment apply not just to the federal government, but also to state governments as well.
How does the Fourteenth Amendment extend the protections of the Fifth Amendment?
1. It ensures the protections are carried out retroactively.
2. It ensures the training necessary for judges to carry out the protections of the Fifth Amendment is in place.
3. It ensures the protections are carried out by state governments as well as the federal government.
4. It ensures government officials are not exempt from the law.
1. It ensures the protections are carried out retroactively.
2. It ensures the training necessary for judges to carry out the protections of the Fifth Amendment is in place.
3. It ensures the protections are carried out by state governments as well as the federal government.
4. It ensures government officials are not exempt from the law.
The Fourteenth Amendment extends the protections of the Fifth Amendment by ensuring that the protections of the Fifth Amendment are carried out by state governments as well as the federal government. (Option 3)
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
–Tenth Amendment
This amendment is an example of which of the following?
Responses
federalism
federalism
prior restraint
prior restraint
sedition
sedition
eminent domain
–Tenth Amendment
This amendment is an example of which of the following?
Responses
federalism
federalism
prior restraint
prior restraint
sedition
sedition
eminent domain
The Tenth Amendment is an example of federalism.
The case of Schenck v. United States (1919) concerned protest activities against American involvement in World War I. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., said that trying to convince draft-age men to resist induction was intended to result in a crime, and posed a “clear and present danger” of succeeding. The Supreme Court decision in the case relates to a limitation on which of the following?
Responses
freedom of speech
freedom of speech
free exercise of religion
free exercise of religion
freedom of the press
freedom of the press
cruel and unusual punishment
Responses
freedom of speech
freedom of speech
free exercise of religion
free exercise of religion
freedom of the press
freedom of the press
cruel and unusual punishment
The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v. United States relates to a limitation on the freedom of speech.
The case of Schenck v. United States (1919) concerned protest activities against American involvement in World War I. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., said that trying to convince draft-age men to resist induction was intended to result in a crime, and posed a “clear and present danger” of succeeding. The Supreme Court decision in the case relates to a limitation on which of the following?
Responses
freedom of speech
freedom of speech
free exercise of religion
free exercise of religion
freedom of the press
freedom of the press
cruel and unusual punishment
cruel and unusual punishment
Responses
freedom of speech
freedom of speech
free exercise of religion
free exercise of religion
freedom of the press
freedom of the press
cruel and unusual punishment
cruel and unusual punishment
The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v. United States relates to a limitation on the freedom of speech.
1 answer