He read that “it took more than two years . . . for the case to tried in court and a verdict to be reached.”

Question

what's the point of this omission.

Answer 1

The omission of specific details about the case and its trial process may serve several purposes in a narrative context. Here are a few possible reasons:

1. Focus on Emotion Over Detail: By omitting intricate details about the case, the focus shifts toward the emotional weight of the situation rather than the technicalities of the legal process. This can heighten the reader's engagement with the characters and their experiences.

2. Building Suspense: The vague timeline can create a sense of suspense or anticipation. Readers might wonder why the case took so long or what obstacles were faced, which keeps them engaged in the story.

3. Universal Experience: The mention of a lengthy wait for a verdict may resonate with readers who have experienced similar delays in their own lives, making the narrative feel more relatable and universal without being bogged down by specifics.

4. Highlighting Complexity of Legal Systems: By stating it took "more than two years," the text may implicitly comment on the complexities and inefficiencies of legal systems, suggesting that justice is not always swift or straightforward.

5. Encouraging Reflection: The omission can prompt readers to reflect on the implications of such long waits for justice, encouraging deeper thought about the legal system, the impact on individuals involved, and the broader themes of justice and fairness.

In essence, the omission allows for broader thematic exploration while maintaining narrative flow and emotional impact.

Answer 2

Pick one for this specific instance

Answer 3

In this specific instance, the most relevant point of omission is emphasizing the emotional weight of the situation. By stating that "it took more than two years" for the case to be tried and a verdict reached without delving into specific details, it highlights the frustration, anxiety, and uncertainty experienced by the individuals involved. This approach focuses the reader's attention on the personal ramifications of the lengthy legal process, making the emotional stakes more pronounced.