(1 point)
Responses
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because the feelings of excitement are higher.
1 answer
An economist would expect that if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter, the most plausible response would be:
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
Stricter negative incentives generally mean that the consequences of breaking the rules are more severe, which typically leads to a decrease in the likelihood of rule-breaking behavior as students weigh the costs of their actions against the benefits.
