hands-only CPR is better than...

a. no cpr
b. conventional cpr
c. an automated external defibrillator

1 answer

Hands-only CPR is better than:

a. no CPR

While conventional CPR (which includes rescue breaths) can be effective in certain situations, hands-only CPR is recommended for untrained bystanders and may be easier to perform in an emergency. It significantly increases the chances of survival compared to doing nothing at all. An automated external defibrillator (AED) is also a valuable tool but is not a replacement for CPR; rather, it should be used in conjunction with CPR when available.

Similar Questions
  1. Hands-only CPR is better than(1 point) Responses no CPR. no CPR. conventional CPR. conventional CPR. an automated external
    1. answers icon 1 answer
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  2. Hands-only CPR is better than(1 point) Responses no CPR. no CPR. conventional CPR. conventional CPR. an automated external
    1. answers icon 1 answer
  3. Hands-only CPR is better thanA. no CPR. B. conventional CPR. C. an automated external defibrillator (AED).
    1. answers icon 1 answer
more similar questions