Hal made an error in step 4.
In that step, he states that 82.5 is closer to 82.62 than it is to 82.44. However, the difference between 82.5 and 82.44 is 0.06, and the difference between 82.5 and 82.62 is only 0.12. Therefore, 82.5 is actually closer to 82.44 than to 82.62.
So, the correct approximation for \( \sqrt{82.5} \) using his method should have been 9.08, not 9.09.