To determine which options are nonviable solutions to the inequality, we need to infer what inequality is being discussed. Without the specific inequality given, we can proceed by analyzing these potential solutions based on common scenarios.
Here are some basic scenarios that could render a solution nonviable:
- If the inequality involves a variable relationship like \( a < c \), a solution where \( a \) is greater than or equal to \( c \) would be nonviable.
- If the inequality has to do with values being positive or within certain bounds, any option outside those bounds might be nonviable.
Let's analyze the provided options under possible basic inequalities:
-
a = 12, c = 2
- If considering \( a > c \), then this is viable since \( 12 > 2 \).
-
a = 5.6, c = 15
- Here, \( a < c \) (5.6 < 15) is also viable.
-
a = 18, c = -3
- Again, \( a > c \) (18 > -3) is viable.
-
a = 0, c = 20
- Here, \( a < c \) (0 < 20) is also viable.
Without knowing the specific inequality, all options provided could potentially be viable, depending on the context of the inequality being tested. However, if these were judged strictly by a common inequality of \( a < c \), then the first scenario \( a = 12, c = 2 \) and the third scenario \( a = 18, c = -3 \) would be nonviable solutions.
Thus, from a mathematical interpretation based on common inequalities:
- Nonviable Solutions: If \( a < c \) is the inequality:
- Candidates: a = 12, c = 2 and a = 18, c = −3 would be nonviable.
If you have a specific inequality, please share it for exact determination. Otherwise, based on common conceptual views, we would assess the answers as described.