To fill in the missing reason for step 2 of the proof, we need to identify what justifies the statement that \(\angle 6\) is congruent to \(\angle 2\). Since lines \(a\) and \(b\) are parallel and \(c\) is a transversal, \(\angle 6\) and \(\angle 2\) are corresponding angles.
Thus, the appropriate reason for step 2 is:
2. Corresponding Angles Postulate
The updated proof would look like this:
| Statement | Reason | |------------------|----------------------------------| | 1. a || b, c is a transversal | 1. given | | 2. ∠6 ≅ ∠2 | 2. Corresponding Angles Postulate | | 3. m∠6 = m∠2 | 3. def. of congruent | | 4. ∠6 is supp. to ∠8 | 4. def. of linear pair | | 5. ∠2 is supp. to ∠8 | 5. congruent supplements theorem |
In conclusion, the missing reason is the Corresponding Angles Postulate.