The debate surrounding whether the events experienced by Armenians during World War I constitute genocide often revolves around interpretations of intent and the context of the era. Those who argue against the characterization of these events as genocide often assert that the deaths of Armenians were not the result of a systematic plan to exterminate the group, but rather were a consequence of wartime conditions, civil unrest, and resistance by some Armenian factions against the Ottoman Empire. They contend that while there were atrocities committed, these were part of a broader context of conflict and instability rather than a deliberate act of genocide aimed at the Armenian population as a whole. Supporters of this view may emphasize the complexity of historical events and argue that labeling the actions as genocide oversimplifies the intricate socio-political dynamics at play during that period.
Genocide or Not? Discussion
Examine Turkey's response to the Armenian genocide.
Why has Turkey attempted to cover up the Armenian genocide?
What methods has Turkey used to deny the truth about the Armenian genocide?
How have other countries reacted to Turkey’s response?
write a small paragraph on why its not genocide
1 answer
1 answer