Discussion Starter: According to Document "Gaza's future: Let NATO Nations Send Troops", the author claims that Israel should retreat their forces from Gaza and create an international force from NATO countries to maintain peace and rebuild civilian authorities. This means that the author believes that international intervention and a two-state solution are necessary for long-term peace in the region.
The author makes these claims because they believe that the current Israeli government is unable to create stability and that diplomatic efforts are crucial for achieving peace. They provide evidence such as the need for rebuilding civilian authorities and starting negotiations with the Palestine Authority.
The author does not acknowledge counterarguments or conflicting evidence in the article, as they are focused on advocating for their proposed plan for peace in Gaza.
Gaza's future : Let NATO Nations Send Troops
December 13, 2023
Ehud Olmert
The New York Times
Primary Source
The article was written to present the author's perspective on what steps should be taken in Gaza's future, specifically focusing on the need for the international force to replace Israeli forces in Gaza and come up with a solution for the two states.
The author's perspective is that Israel should retreat their forces from Gaza, and create an international force from NATO countries to keep peace and rebuild the civilian authorities, and start talks for a two-state solution with Palestine.
This source that comes from the New York Times written by Ehud Olmert, a person who was a Prime Minister of Israel, can be reliable on the topic of Israeli-Palestinian relations and the situation in Gaza. But, like any other opinion piece, its tells us the author's perspective and can be seen as a simple viewpoint like many others.
The author’s main point about the topic is that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza will not be enough to make peace and stability in the region, and that a long-term plan involving international intervention and negotiations with the Palestine Authority is needed.
The author claims that Israel’s military campaign must be followed by the deployment of the international force, talks with the Palestine Authority for a two-state solution, and the removal of the Israeli government.
The author provides reasons for these claims by arguing that the current Israel government is unable to do the right things to create peace.
The supporting evidence provided by the author includes the idea of deploying an international force, rebuilding civilian authorities, and starting negotiations with the Palestine Authority.
The author uses words like “unwilling, unable, and unprepared” to describe the Netanyahu government suggests a negative bias on the Israeli leadership.
The author also describes the need for international intervention and a two-state solution, which could be seen as a positive bias towards these actions.
The author’s arguments show why the current Israel government is not doing enough and why international support is needed for peace in the region. They focus on the importance of diplomatic efforts and rebuilding civilian authorities to make peace.
The author doesn’t discuss other viewpoints or evidence that may oppose their ideas. They are mainly focused on making a plan to make peace in the region.
The article suggests that to achieve peace, countries must step in to help Gaza, rebuild its government, and negotiate for two separate states. The writer believes that a new Israel government is needed for reaching peace and stability.
Using this information use the discussion starter: Discussion Starter : According to Document _____ the author claims _____. This means ___. The author makes these claims because _____ and ____ . They provide evidence/examples such as ___ and ____. The author (does/does not) acknowledge counterarguments & conflicting evidence (but/and) ____.
1 answer
2 answers