The investigators in the Smallville Apartments case are incorrect to be confident in their arrest for several reasons:
-
Lack of Individualization: Just because the suspect has both loop and whorl patterns does not provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the prints found at the scene belong to him. Fingerprint analysis relies on minutiae points, which are the unique ridge characteristics that differentiate one fingerprint from another. The investigators did not confirm that there were enough matching minutiae points between the collected prints and the suspect's fingerprints to establish a definitive match. Without a minimum of 8-16 points being verified and no non-matching points being present, they cannot claim with certainty that the fingerprints belong to him.
-
Insufficient Comparison Process: The investigators rushed to identify the suspect based solely on the observation that he had similar types of prints (loops and whorls) without thoroughly comparing the specific patterns and minutiae of the collected prints to those in the suspect’s record. A detailed side-by-side comparison is necessary to substantiate any match or exclusion based on specific details of ridge endings, bifurcations, and other minutiae.
-
Ignoring Other Possibilities: Fingerprints can be found at a crime scene that do not necessarily belong to the perpetrator. The area might contain prints from previous occupants, visitors, or maintenance staff. The investigators did not consider the likelihood that the prints belonged to someone else who had legitimate access to the apartment. A proper investigation would require a wider range of fingerprint analysis and consideration of the circumstances surrounding the scene.
Regarding the type of prints found on the kitchen counter, it is likely that they were latent prints. These are invisible to the naked eye because they are left by the transfer of body oils and sweat when a person touches a surface.
To lift and evaluate the latent prints, the investigators could use fingerprint powder as a lifting technique. Fingerprint powder comes in various colors and is chosen based on the contrast with the surface where the print is located. The investigators would lightly dust the surface with the powder using a soft brush to adhere to the oils in the latent prints. After the latent prints are made visible, they can then use clear adhesive tape to lift the prints from the surface for further examination and analysis in the lab. This method allows for better preservation and clarity of the prints to compare against known samples.