Asked by pleaseanswer

Frenda et al. (2013, p. 285) stated "first, because Slate gathered little information about its participants other than political ideology, it may be that variables confounded with ideology—and not ideology per se—were responsible for the differences we observed between conservatives and liberals."

Note two other potential confounds in this study and explain
Answered by bobpursley
confounds:

little information about its participants

political ideology

variables confounds

conservatives and liberals

Others: who participated? was it random or groups that wanted to change the outcomes?
what was the size of the sample?
exactly what information was gathered?
Was that information valid?
Exactly what differences we observed means?
Answered by pleaseanswer
can you explain in more depth
Answered by Ms. Sue
What are your answers to Bobpursley's questions?

Answered by pleaseanswer
thats already a variable in the question which said not to use
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!