For every reaction there is an exact opposite reaction. True! The question one could ask and explore is what came first? or who or what the reaction is. Could we agree good is supieror to evil just to make my point your preference, makes no difference. If you could chose to be blind or see what would you chose? To see would be supreme would you agree then if light is to be chosen, what came first light or darkness? If light or to see is supreme opposed to blindness and darkness, could it then be said the supreme came first and then its exact oppiste was its reaction, would it not? If you were to chose the latter could truth if we could agree truth is good and lies to be blindness and there is only one which is not divided, would that not be true?

Question

For every reaction there is an exact opposite reaction. True! The question one could ask and explore is what came first? or who or what the reaction is. Could we agree good is supieror to evil just to make my point your preference, makes no difference.  If you could chose to be blind or see what would you chose? To see would be supreme would you agree then if light is to be chosen, what came first light or darkness? If light or to see is supreme opposed to blindness and darkness, could it then be said the supreme came first and then its exact oppiste was its reaction, would it not? If you were to chose the latter could truth if we could agree truth is good and lies to be blindness and there is only one which is not divided, would that not be true?