First, explain what civil liberties are. Then, look at the first amendment. The first amendment states “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or the press.” In practice, however, the Supreme Court has never regarded these protections as absolute. What exceptions has it carved out in the protection of these freedoms? Why have certain types of speech and press been excluded from constitutional protection? Has the Court been successful in balancing free expression with other important political values (what are these other values?)? Why or why not? Over time, do you think the government and the Supreme Court regulation of these freedoms has done more to expand or repress free expression? Why? Explain and defend your arguments by referencing pertinent court cases.

Answer 1

My goodness! These look like assignments from a whole course!

How would you like us to help you with this assignment?

Answer 2

No it is an essay question and I need the answer.

Answer 3

You've posted in the wrong forum. We do not do homework assignments or tests.