To find the numerical equivalent of \(102 \cdot 103\), we can calculate it directly:
\[ 102 \cdot 103 = 10200 + 306 = 10506 \]
Upon checking, it looks like the options provided do not match the calculated value. If we consider \(10^5\) as \(100,000\), since \(100,000\) is \(10^5\), then that could be a mistake in the values listed.
However, if you meant \(102\) and \(103\) as two separate factors, calculating like this:
\[ 102 \cdot 103 = 10506 \]
None of the options given under your choices reflect this calculation.
Therefore, if you meant to write it out as a mathematical or simplified concept of approximation, for context to the powers of ten — no option is providing a reasonable answer.
Final calculation for clarification: \[ 102 \cdot 103 \approx 10506 \] But this doesn't match any of your given responses. Please double-check that there are no typographical errors in the question or options provided.
If you consider \(10^5\) simply as the math expression for equivalent options, then:
- Equivalently, \(102\cdot 103\) is not \(100,000\) (which is \(10^5\)).
If the expected answer options have been mislisted for some reason ballpark estimates can be drawn near equivalent approximations under \(100,000\) .
So you'd want \(100,000\) as the closest match from that viewpoint while the exact product remains \(10,506\). Would you have more clarification on what you are specifically looking for?