The correct response is:
by creating a dichotomy between the "new order of tyranny" and the "moral order."
This choice clarifies Roosevelt's position that neutrality is impossible by contrasting the aggressive and oppressive nature of the dictators' "new order" with the positive vision of a "moral order" based on essential freedoms. It suggests that remaining neutral would mean acquiescing to tyranny, which is incompatible with the moral principles he advocates.