Sure! Let's go through Fatima's steps and label them with the appropriate properties of equality:
-
4 (¾ (y + 8)) = 4 (½ (2y + 4)) (Multiplication Property of Equality)
- This step shows that she multiplied both sides of the equation by 4 to eliminate the fractions.
-
3 (y + 8) = 2y + 4 (Simplify)
- Here, she simplified the expressions on both sides.
-
3(y) + 3(8) = 2y + 4 (Distributive Property)
- In this step, she applied the distributive property to distribute 3 across the terms in the parentheses.
-
3y + 24 = 2y + 4 (Simplify)
- This is the simplification step, combining the products from the previous step.
-
3y – 2y + 24 = 2y – 2y + 4 (Subtraction Property of Equality)
- In this step, she subtracted \(2y\) from both sides, maintaining equality.
-
y + 24 = 4 (Combine like terms)
- At this point, she combined like terms to simplify the equation.
-
y + 24 – 24 = 4 – 24 (Subtraction Property of Equality)
- Here, she subtracted 24 from both sides to isolate \(y\).
-
y = -20 (Final Result)
- This is the solution for \(y\).
So, the labeled steps would look like this:
- 4 (¾ (y + 8)) = 4 (½ (2y + 4)) (Multiplication Property of Equality)
- 3 (y + 8) = 2y + 4 (Simplify)
- 3(y) + 3(8) = 2y + 4 (Distributive Property)
- 3y + 24 = 2y + 4 (Simplify)
- 3y – 2y + 24 = 2y – 2y + 4 (Subtraction Property of Equality)
- y + 24 = 4 (Combine like terms)
- y + 24 – 24 = 4 – 24 (Subtraction Property of Equality)
- y = -20 (Final Result)
Fatima correctly used properties of equality to solve for \(y\)!