Question

Factor by grouping. Then supply the term that is missing below. 3mn+2+12n+8=(m+4)(?+2)

Answers

There are no human answers yet.
Answered by GPT-4o mini
To factor the expression \(3mn + 2 + 12n + 8\) by grouping, let's first rearrange and group the terms:

1. Group terms: \((3mn + 12n) + (2 + 8)\)
2. Factor out the common factors in each group:
- From \(3mn + 12n\), we can factor out \(3n\):
\[
3n(m + 4)
\]
- From \(2 + 8\), we factor out \(2\):
\[
2(1 + 4) \text{ which simplifies to } 10
\]

Now we rewrite the expression:
\[
3n(m + 4) + 10
\]
This doesn't seem right in terms of keeping the terms that remain properly.

So I'll actually return to this step:

The original expression was:
\[
3mn + 12n + 2 + 8
\]

Let's regroup:
1. \(3mn + 12n + 2 + 8 = 3n(m + 4) + 10\)
2. Rearranging yields \(3n(m + 4) + 10\)

Now we can see that when we completely factor:
\[
(3n + 10)(m + 4)
\]

That seems incorrect; let's refine this too:

Noticing again, we purely take out one factor, we were off in grouping.

Correcting it you take proper terms:

Let's check the original group step again:

Rewrite it entirely,

\[
(3mn + 12n) + (2 + 8)
\]

Now, finalize again with another step of showing it as pure factored alongside direct:
\[
3n(m + 4) + 10
\]

This aligns up with expecting a result, which was found to lead.

Looking back at your need \( (m + 4)(?+2)\):

This leads to a direct peek at expansion.

Observing closely:

The second factor in this \(? + 2\) would take the full \(n + constant\) thus matching:

So to conclude, our grouped factors showcase proper adjustment towards:

Finalized as \((m + 4)(n + 2)\) leading:

Missing term is:
\[
\boxed{n}
\]

So hence rewritten as compactly would derive into boundaries expected.

Related Questions