Ask a New Question
Duplicate Question

The question on this page has been marked as a duplicate question.


Original Question
Explain why you need to prove 2 triangles congruent before you can prove the parts of the triangles congruent.

Asked by Dr. wells

explain why you need to prove 2 angles congruent before you can prove the parts of the triangles congruent.
1 year ago

Answers

There are no human answers yet.
There are no AI answers yet. The ability to request AI answers is coming soon!

Submit Your Answer


We prioritize human answers over AI answers.

If you are human, and you can answer this question, please submit your answer.

Related Questions

Explain why you need to prove 2 triangles congruent before you can prove the parts of the triangles... explain the prove the profit maximization of the consumer mu=p, according to cardinalist If A + B + C = 180° prove that Sin2A + sin2B – sin2C = 4cosAcosBsinC Prove (A1 + A2 +...+ An)^T = A1^T + A2^T +...+ An^T using Mathimatical Induction. Prove:sin ^2(7π/8)+sin^2(5π/8)+sin^2(3π/8)+sin^2(π/8)=0 Sn=(n^2+n)^1/2 - n Prove that Sn < 1/2 for all n prove that sin(2a+6b) + sin(6a+2b)/sin4a + sin4b = cos(2a+2b) Which can be used to prove d t? (1 point) Responses Transitive Property of Parallel Lines Transitive... Prove that (2a,4a), (2a,6a) and (2a+a root3,5a) are vertices of an equilateral triangle. X/y=z prove that 13/12=2???
Submit Your Answer

Question

explain why you need to prove 2 angles congruent before you can prove the parts of the triangles congruent.

Ask a New Question
Archives Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms of Use