Timbuktu was a center for learning similar to the institutions that preceded universities in Europe. It became a significant hub for education, culture, and trade, particularly during the 15th and 16th centuries. The city attracted scholars, poets, and theologians, and housed important institutions like the University of Sankore, contributing to the preservation and advancement of knowledge in various fields, including mathematics, astronomy, and literature.
Explain the significance of Timbuktu in West Africa.(1 point)
Responses
Timbuktu was a center for learning similar to the institutions that preceded universities in Europe.
Timbuktu was a center for learning similar to the institutions that preceded universities in Europe.
Timbuktu was the capital of the Nok culture.
Timbuktu was the capital of the Nok culture.
Timbuktu was a popular tourist destination.
Timbuktu was a popular tourist destination.
Timbuktu was the origin point of iron-smelting in West Africa.
11 answers
what is the answer
The correct answer is: Timbuktu was a center for learning similar to the institutions that preceded universities in Europe. This highlights Timbuktu's historical significance as a major hub of education and scholarship in West Africa.
Which of the following best explains the relative significance of the trans-Saharan and Indian Ocean trade routes?(1 point)
Responses
Trans-Saharan trade was more significant because it had more valuable resources such as salt, gold, and ivory.
Trans-Saharan trade was more significant because it had more valuable resources such as salt, gold, and ivory.
The routes were equally significant—each in its own way—as they both contributed to significant cultural developments along the routes, and worth cannot be measured simply by the goods that were traded.
The routes were equally significant—each in its own way—as they both contributed to significant cultural developments along the routes, and worth cannot be measured simply by the goods that were traded.
Neither of them was significant because both were limited in whom they could reach.
Neither of them was significant because both were limited in whom they could reach.
The Indian Ocean basin was more significant because it connected the Middle East and parts of Africa with Asia, specifically China, and it had important goods such as silk and porcelain.
Responses
Trans-Saharan trade was more significant because it had more valuable resources such as salt, gold, and ivory.
Trans-Saharan trade was more significant because it had more valuable resources such as salt, gold, and ivory.
The routes were equally significant—each in its own way—as they both contributed to significant cultural developments along the routes, and worth cannot be measured simply by the goods that were traded.
The routes were equally significant—each in its own way—as they both contributed to significant cultural developments along the routes, and worth cannot be measured simply by the goods that were traded.
Neither of them was significant because both were limited in whom they could reach.
Neither of them was significant because both were limited in whom they could reach.
The Indian Ocean basin was more significant because it connected the Middle East and parts of Africa with Asia, specifically China, and it had important goods such as silk and porcelain.
The best answer is: The routes were equally significant—each in its own way—as they both contributed to significant cultural developments along the routes, and worth cannot be measured simply by the goods that were traded. This response acknowledges the unique contributions of both trade routes to cultural exchange and development, emphasizing their importance beyond just the material goods traded.
Describe why religions expanded on the trade routes.(1 point)
Responses
Merchants were forced to convert in order to trade.
Merchants were forced to convert in order to trade.
It was cheaper to trade as a Muslim or Christian.
It was cheaper to trade as a Muslim or Christian.
Merchants and traders exchanged ideas as well as products.
Merchants and traders exchanged ideas as well as products.
War encouraged people to convert.
Responses
Merchants were forced to convert in order to trade.
Merchants were forced to convert in order to trade.
It was cheaper to trade as a Muslim or Christian.
It was cheaper to trade as a Muslim or Christian.
Merchants and traders exchanged ideas as well as products.
Merchants and traders exchanged ideas as well as products.
War encouraged people to convert.
The correct answer is: Merchants and traders exchanged ideas as well as products. This response highlights how trade routes facilitated not just the exchange of goods, but also the spreading of religions as merchants and traders interacted with different cultures and communities, sharing their beliefs and practices along the way.
Which of these continents would be difficult to connect to via the trade routes?(1 point)
Responses
Europe
Europe
Asia
Asia
North America
North America
Africa
Responses
Europe
Europe
Asia
Asia
North America
North America
Africa
The correct answer is: North America. Historically, North America was not directly connected to the major trade routes like the Silk Road or the trans-Saharan trade routes that linked Europe, Asia, and Africa. Consequently, it would have been more difficult to connect to these established trade networks.
Which of the following best describes why Mehmed II continued to trade with the Genoese despite their alliance with the Byzantines?(1 point)
Responses
The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.
The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
They were already trading partners.
They were already trading partners.
Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally.
Responses
The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.
The Genoese betrayed the Byzantines, so the Ottomans trusted them.
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood.
They were already trading partners.
They were already trading partners.
Genoa was also a Muslim kingdom and its similar faith made it a natural ally.
The best answer is: Mehmed II understood the importance and benefits of maintaining trade with the Genoese, just as the Byzantines understood. This response highlights the strategic value of trade relationships, as both the Ottomans and the Byzantines recognized that trading with the Genoese was beneficial for economic reasons, despite their political alliances.
1 answer