Explain the origin of the civil rights movement as it relates to constitutional interpretation.(1 point)

Question

Responses

It originated with the legal definition of private property leading to discriminatory treatment against Black Americans.
It originated with the legal definition of private property leading to discriminatory treatment against Black Americans.

It originated with states not following such federal laws as the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
It originated with states not following such federal laws as the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

It originated with the lack of a constitutional amendment that granted formerly enslaved people the right to vote.
It originated with the lack of a constitutional amendment that granted formerly enslaved people the right to vote.

It originated with individuals, corporations, and states not following constitutional amendments and prescribing equal treatment for education and private property.

Answer 1

The civil rights movement can be understood as originating from a combination of factors related to constitutional interpretation. One significant aspect is how individuals, corporations, and states often failed to adhere to constitutional amendments aimed at ensuring equal treatment, particularly in areas such as education and private property.

The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were pivotal in establishing rights for formerly enslaved individuals and addressing issues of equality and voting. However, discriminatory practices, such as Jim Crow laws, and systemic inequities persisted, undermining these constitutional guarantees. The civil rights movement sought not only to highlight these injustices but also to push for a reinterpretation and stronger enforcement of these constitutional principles. Activists aimed to hold states and localities accountable for their refusal to comply with federal laws designed to protect civil rights, effectively framing their struggle within the context of constitutional interpretation and enforcement.

Thus, the correct response would be that it originated with individuals, corporations, and states not following constitutional amendments and prescribing equal treatment for education and private property.