Excerpt from Lafollette's "The Doctrine of Fear", 1941

Out of that turbulent Germany that I saw in 1933 has come a new kind of human strength—distorted and evil—but tremendously effective strength, as we have seen in the last year. We may hate it and curse it and spit on it but we can't talk it away. And the thing we have to remember most of all is that we can't lick it in the easy, inexpensive way. We can't buy our freedom with somebody else's blood. We can't hire Hessians to fight and die for us. The freedom of every inch of America was decided not by battles in Europe, but by the courageous pioneering of men and women who left Europe because they wanted no more of the endless bloodshed and interminable wars of the old world.

. . .

Nobody gave us our liberty. We fought and won it. Nobody guarded it for us this century and a half—we did it ourselves. Nobody is going to protect it for us in the years ahead. There will be a free America only so long as we, and we alone, have the stuff it takes to keep us free.

Mark this, if we go to war to save democracy in Europe, we shall wind up by losing democracy at home. Worse than financial bankruptcy, worse even than the loss of life, is the fact that such a war would be followed by the worst era of demogogues the world has known. Every scoundrel, sowing the seeds of racial, religious and class hatred, would find a thousand-fold increase, in the fields he can till, if we make hatred respectable, by joining in war.

Use the excerpts from "The Four Freedoms" and "The Doctrine of Fear" to answer the question.

As these two excerpt demonstrate, there were multiple opinions as to the stance the United States should take regarding the conflict in Europe and its relationship to the interests of the United States. Write an essay in which you describe the opinions expressed in these excerpts and explain how each interprets American interests regarding the war. Formulate your essay around a thesis statement that supports or refutes one or both of the arguments provided in the excerpts.

2 answers

The excerpts from "The Four Freedoms" and "The Doctrine of Fear" demonstrate differing opinions on the involvement of the United States in the conflict in Europe and its relationship to American interests. Franklin D. Roosevelt's "The Four Freedoms" speech issued a call to arms to defend democracy and freedom around the world. Conversely, Lafollette's "The Doctrine of Fear" argued against entering the war in Europe, stating that it would lead to the loss of democracy at home.

In "The Four Freedoms," Roosevelt argues for the protection of four fundamental freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear. He expressed his belief that these freedoms should be enjoyed by people everywhere, and that America had a responsibility to protect them around the world, even if it meant going to war.

On the other hand, Lafollette in "The Doctrine of Fear" argues that America cannot win the war by hiring others to fight and die for it. He demonstrated his belief that Americans had won their freedom by fighting for it themselves, and that the same must be done to protect it. He argued that entering the war would lead to an era of demagogues in America promoting racial, religious, and class hatred.

In my opinion, the argument presented by Roosevelt in "The Four Freedoms" is more compelling as it supports universal values for all humanity. Roosevelt called for the protection of fundamental human rights around the world, and that America had a duty to promote democracy and freedom elsewhere. Roosevelt advocated for the empowerment of all people around the world, believing that this would ultimately safeguard America's own interests. It is particularly relevant today in a globalized world where the security and prosperity of the U.S. largely depend upon the developments abroad. In conclusion, the American interests must go beyond the domestic realm and encompass preserving democracy and peace around the world.
Excerpt from the Preamble to the United Nations Charter, 1945

WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS DETERMINED

to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind, and

to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small, and

to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained, and

to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

AND FOR THESE ENDS

to practice tolerance and live together in peace with one another as good neighbours, and

to unite our strength to maintain international peace and security, and

to ensure, by the acceptance of principles and the institution of methods, that armed force shall not be used, save in the common interest, and

to employ international machinery for the promotion of the economic and social advancement of all peoples,

HAVE RESOLVED TO COMBINE OUR EFFORTS TO ACCOMPLISH THESE AIMS

Accordingly, our respective Governments, through representatives assembled in the city of San Francisco, who have exhibited their full powers found to be in good and due form, have agreed to the present Charter of the United Nations and do hereby establish an international organization to be known as the United Nations.

Use the preamble to the United Nations Charter to answer the question.

Using the preamble to the United Nations Charter, answer (a), (b), and (c).

In 1–2 sentences, identify the primary purpose of the United Nations.
In 2–3 sentences, provide at least two reasons the preamble provides for the establishment of the U.N.
In 2–3 sentences, explain the significance of the U.N. in the postwar period.