Example 4: Polling The 1936 presidential election proved a decisive battle, not only in shaping the nation's political future, but for the future of opinion polling as well. The Literary Digest, the venerable magazine founded in 1890 , had correctly predicted the outcomes of the 1916, 1920, 1924, 1928, and 1932 elections by conducting polls. The 1936 postal card poll claimed to have asked one fourth of the nation's voters which candidate they intended to vote for. Cards were sent to a sample of Americans drawn from telephone directories and car registration lists. In Literary Digest's October 31 issue, based on more than 2,000,000 returned post cards, it issued its prediction: Republican presidential candidate Alfred Landon would win 57% of the popular vote. In actuality, only 37% of voters supported Landon. How would you categorize the sampling design? Do you think such a large sampling error was primarily due to sampling variability or do you suspect there was some type of sampling bias at play?
1 answer
The large sampling error in this case is likely due to sampling bias. The sample was drawn from telephone directories and car registration lists, which may have introduced a bias towards certain demographics or socioeconomic groups. Additionally, the mailing of post cards may have reached only a specific subset of the population who were more likely to respond, leading to a potential bias in the results.