“Every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual. Our prayers have been rejected with disdain;

Question

and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in Kings more than repeated
petitioning — and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the Kings of Europe absolute:
Witness Denmark and Sweden. Wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for God's sake, let us come to a final
separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of
parent and child.”
2. In this paragraph what is Paine saying about what has been done and what needs to change? What type
of evidence does he use to support this?

Answer 1

In this paragraph, Thomas Paine is articulating his frustration with the ineffectiveness of peaceful methods for achieving political change and peace. He argues that repeated petitions and prayers have been disregarded by those in power—specifically, the kings of Europe—demonstrating that such measures only serve to reinforce their arrogance and obstinacy. Paine suggests that these quiet methods have not only failed to elicit a positive response but have also contributed to the establishment of absolutism in countries like Denmark and Sweden.

To advocate for change, he calls for a "final separation," implying that a radical and decisive break is necessary rather than continuing the futile cycle of appeals. He expresses a desire to prevent future generations from suffering the consequences of a failed peace process, which might lead to violence and conflict.

Paine uses historical evidence to support his argument, referencing the political situations in Denmark and Sweden as examples of how petitioning has empowered monarchs and hindered the political growth of nations. By highlighting these failed attempts at peaceful resolution, he reinforces his belief that only "blows"—or active, forceful resistance—will yield the change needed for freedom and self-determination. His rhetorical style amplifies his call for action, suggesting that inaction will only perpetuate a cycle of violence and oppression.