Even if many people prefer physical books to e-books, e-books are an important product evolution that should continue to receive support and attention from innovators. E-books make reading more accessible for those with disabilities. The ability to size text according to one’s needs means that people for whom print size matters, but large print books are either unavailable or not adequate can enjoy a wider variety of texts. E-books also afford readers convenience, versatility, and money-saving options physical books do not. It would be a shame for publishing companies to allow this relatively new technology to stagnate.

Question

Question
Use the paragraph to answer the question.

Which sentence would weaken the writer’s argument if they chose to add it?

(1 point)
Responses

People who make a big fuss about preferring physical books need to get over themselves.
People who make a big fuss about preferring physical books need to get over themselves.

People who prefer physical books to e-books can keep reading them—but others want and sometimes need more options.
People who prefer physical books to e-books can keep reading them—but others want and sometimes need more options.

Physical books have been around for centuries, and they are not likely to go away soon—but the time may be ripe for the rise of e-books.
Physical books have been around for centuries, and they are not likely to go away soon—but the time may be ripe for the rise of e-books.

People who want physical books to be gone entirely are probably going to be disappointed.

Answer 1

The sentence that would weaken the writer’s argument if they chose to add it is:

"People who make a big fuss about preferring physical books need to get over themselves."

This statement dismisses those who prefer physical books and could undermine the writer's argument by portraying it as condescending or overly confrontational, rather than focusing on the benefits and importance of e-books in a more constructive manner.