Emily opted to perform a trial to ascertain if stirring impacts the speed at which an antacid dissolves. Her hypothesis posited that increasing the speed of stirring would lead to a decreased duration for the antacid to dissolve.

Sample: X
Amount of water (in mL): 300
Temperature of water (in °C): 25
Rate of stirring: No stirring
Time required to dissolve in seconds: 220
Sample: Y
Amount of water (in mL): 300
Temperature of water (in °C): 25
Rate of stirring: Slow stirring
Time required to dissolve in seconds: 80
Sample: Z
Amount of water (in mL): 300
Temperature of water (in °C): 25
Rate of stirring: Fast stirring
Time required to dissolve in seconds: 45

Based on her data, what can we conclude?
A. The data is biased.
B. The data supports the hypothesis.
C. The data does not support the hypothesis.
D. The data has no relationship to the hypothesis.

1 answer

The data collected by Emily shows a clear trend that supports her hypothesis. As the rate of stirring increases (from no stirring to slow stirring to fast stirring), the time required for the antacid to dissolve decreases significantly (220 seconds for no stirring, 80 seconds for slow stirring, and 45 seconds for fast stirring).

Based on this consideration, the appropriate conclusion is:

B. The data supports the hypothesis.