I apologize for any confusion. Let’s clarify the work done by Ella:
-
For the first expression \( 5f + 3.6 \):
- When Ella substituted \( f = 1 \):
- \( 5(1) + 3.6 = 5 + 3.6 = 8.6 \)
-
For the second expression \( 6f + 2.6 \):
- When Ella substituted \( f = 1 \):
- \( 6(1) + 2.6 = 6 + 2.6 = 8.6 \)
Since both expressions yield the same result of \( 8.6 \) when \( f = 1 \), we might consider them equivalent at that point. However, to fully determine if the expressions are equivalent for all values of \( f \), we can express the two equations generally:
- \( 5f + 3.6 \)
- \( 6f + 2.6 \)
If we compare the coefficients of \( f \) and the constant terms, we see:
- \( 5f + 3.6 \) has a coefficient of 5 for \( f \) and a constant of \( 3.6 \).
- \( 6f + 2.6 \) has a coefficient of 6 for \( f \) and a constant of \( 2.6 \).
Because the coefficients of \( f \) in each expression differ, these expressions are not equivalent in general (outside of the specific value \( f = 1 \)).
Therefore, the correct answer is:
D. The expressions are not equivalent because Ella would get different results when substituting different numbers for \( f \).
Thank you for your patience, and I'm glad to clarify!