I apologize for any confusion in my previous response. Let's review the statements again.
Ella tested the two expressions:
-
First expression:
\( 5f + 3.6 \)
- Substitute \( f = 1 \):
\[
5(1) + 3.6 = 5 + 3.6 = 8.6
\]
-
Second expression:
\( 6f + 2.6 \)
- Substitute \( f = 1 \):
\[
6(1) + 2.6 = 6 + 2.6 = 8.6
\]
Both expressions evaluate to 8.6 when \( f = 1 \). However, if we want to determine if they are equivalent for all values of \( f \), we can compare the expressions more generally.
- The first expression simplifies to \( 5f + 3.6 \).
- The second expression simplifies to \( 6f + 2.6 \).
These are linear expressions with different coefficients for \( f \). For example, if you substitute \( f = 0 \):
- For the first expression: \( 5(0) + 3.6 = 3.6 \)
- For the second expression: \( 6(0) + 2.6 = 2.6 \)
The results are different. Therefore, while they yield the same result when substituting \( f = 1 \), they are not equivalent since they give different results for other values of \( f \).
Thus, the correct response would be:
The expressions are not equivalent because Ella would get different results when substituting different numbers for f.
Thank you for your patience, and I apologize for the error in my initial response.