Effectiveness and ineffectiveness of the SAHRC institutions 3 points each

Answer 1

Effectiveness:

1. The SAHRC has been successful in promoting and protecting human rights in South Africa through its advocacy and education programs. It has created awareness among the public about human rights, and has supported victims of human rights violations.

2. The Commission has taken on cases of human rights violations and has brought attention to them through its investigations. This has resulted in actions taken against perpetrators, including legal redress, policy changes, and reparations for victims.

3. The SAHRC has established partnerships with civil society organizations, government agencies, and international bodies to enhance its work and promote human rights. These collaborations have resulted in joint efforts to address human rights issues in South Africa, and have amplified the voices of marginalized groups.

Ineffectiveness:

1. Despite its efforts, the SAHRC has been criticized for being slow and ineffective in responding to human rights violations. There have been cases where the Commission has taken too long to investigate, and its recommendations have been ignored by the government.

2. The SAHRC has been criticized for lacking resources, both human and financial, to effectively carry out its mandate. This has resulted in a limited reach, especially in rural areas, and a lack of capacity to investigate complex cases.

3. The Commission has been criticized for lacking independence from political influence. There have been cases where the SAHRC has been accused of protecting the government from scrutiny, and not being objective in its investigations.